[ipxe-devel] Two problems/bugs in iPXE related to multiple NICs

Michael Brown mbrown at fensystems.co.uk
Tue Mar 5 16:38:32 UTC 2013

On 05/03/13 15:44, Robin Smidsrød wrote:
> On 05.03.2013 15:44, Michael Brown wrote:
>> On 05/03/13 14:34, Robin Smidsrød wrote:
>>> If we use semantic versioning as explained on http://semver.org/, then
>>> we'd normally just increment the Z part of the X.Y.Z version string. And
>>> if any particular month introduces a particularly important change, we
>>> could increment the Y. If we break back-compat in any way, we increment
>>> X. Technically, the change we did with how to deal with ANSI codes
>>> should've required an increment of X.
>> Which change relating to ANSI codes?
> This one:
> https://git.ipxe.org/ipxe.git/commitdiff/25ec56e0ecaa516a790fc409798e031af4bba650

Ah, that makes sense.  I was searching the git log for ANSI, which 
didn't reveal that commit.


More information about the ipxe-devel mailing list