[ipxe-devel] Implicit SAN+PXE?

[Michael Brown]

On Friday 12 Nov 2010 20:17:58 Jarrod Johnson wrote:
> Ok, patch for review at:
> https://xcat.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/xcat/xcat-dep/trunk/xnba/ipxe-regi
> stersan.patch
> 
> <https://xcat.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/xcat/xcat-dep/trunk/xnba/ipxe-reg
> istersan.patch>This patch was 'good enough' for my purposes.
> 
> It does request another 256 byte set of chars.
> 
> There is an amount of code duplication between 'boot_root_path' and
> 'reg_root_path' in this approach.

Thanks.  I'll rework this to avoid the duplication.

Michael